News & Information

Municipal Law Updates


February 18, 2021

Cities can be reimbursed by the State for certain costs associated with compliance with stormwater discharge permit requirements.

Summary In Department of Finance v. Commission on State Mandates (2021) 59 Cal.App.5th 546, the Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District held that city costs associated with installing and maintaining trash receptacles at transit stops in compliance with stormwater drain permits are reimbursable by the State of California, but costs associated with inspection…

READ FULL ARTICLE
December 3, 2020

Oakland’s suit against Wells Fargo for predatory lending practices based on race can seek lost property-tax revenue

Summary In City of Oakland v. Wells Fargo & Co., 972 F.3d 1112 (9th Cir. Cal. 2020), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that cities can seek injunctive relief and recovery of lost property-tax revenue from banks that violate the Fair Housing Act by using predatory lending practices against minorities. The Ninth Circuit held…

READ FULL ARTICLE
November 18, 2020

State law addresses Brown Act implications of social media use by members of a legislative body

AB 992 In a world that communicates with posting, reposting, texting, screenshotting, tweeting, liking, disliking, happy or sad emojis and commenting on posts, it was inevitable that public officials would enter onto that internet “platform” and communicate their thoughts and ideas to anyone who had access to a computer. Instead of stepping into the local…

READ FULL ARTICLE
November 18, 2020

Court of Appeal clarifies procedures and deadlines under Eminent Domain Law

Summary The Court of Appeal in Rutgard v. City of Los Angeles, 52 Cal. App. 5th 815 (2020) held that a public agency desiring to retain condemned property that has not yet been put to public use must adopt a reauthorization resolution within ten years of the initial resolution declaring the public need. The Court…

READ FULL ARTICLE
October 26, 2020

Exception to mobile billboard ordinance for “authorized vehicles” is likely an invalid content-based restriction on free speech.

Summary A city ordinance that prohibited mobile billboards except for “authorized vehicles” including emergency vehicles and construction/maintenance vehicles is a content-based restriction on free speech and presumptively invalid. Discussion In 2016, the City of Simi Valley (“City”) adopted an ordinance that prohibits the parking or standing of mobile billboard advertising displays on city streets. The…

READ FULL ARTICLE
October 21, 2019

California Supreme Court clarifies that to be liable in inverse condemnation, damage to private property must be substantially caused by inherent risks associated with the design, construction, or maintenance of a public improvement.

I. SUMMARY The California Supreme Court recently held1 that the City of Oroville (“City”) was not liable in inverse condemnation when untreated sewage backed up into a dental office because the property owner failed to demonstrate the resulting damage was substantially caused by inherent risks in the design, construction, or maintenance of the sewer system….

READ FULL ARTICLE
April 8, 2019

City council meeting agendas must be posted prominently on a city’s internet homepage and must be searchable by commonly used internet search applications

SUMMARY In 2016, the Legislature adopted Assembly Bill 2257 (“AB 2257”) which amended Government Code Section 54954.2 by adding new requirements for posting city council agendas. Effective January 1, 2019, Gov. Code Section 54954.2(a)(2) requires that meeting agendas for all “legislative bodies” be posted on a city’s internet homepage, be retrievable, downloadable, indexable, electronically searchable,…

READ FULL ARTICLE
April 4, 2019

Cities cannot limit public comments at special meetings based on comments at prior, distinct meetings.

SUMMARY On February 22, 2019, the California Second District Court of Appeal, in Preven v. City of L.A.,1 held that while the Brown Act allows for restricting public comment under certain conditions at regular meetings, the Act does not permit limiting comment at special city council meetings based on public comments at prior, distinct committee…

READ FULL ARTICLE