Jones&Mayer - Case Updates

JONES & MAYER

3777 North Harbor Boulevard
Fullerton, CA 92835
Telephone: (714) 446 1400 Fax: (714) 446 1448 ** e-mail: MJM@JONES-MAYER.COM
Visit our Web Site: WWW.JONES-MAYER.COM

JONES & MAYER - RECENT CASE UPDATES

Vol. Twenty No. Eleven - November 2005

IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez (2005) 126 S.Ct. 514
WHO BEARS THE FINANCIAL BURDEN FOR MANDATED UNIFORMS?

McKee v. Los Angeles Interagency Metropolitan Police Apprehension Crime Task Force (2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 354
INTERAGENCY TASK FORCE COMPELLED TO COMPLY WITH BROWN ACT G.C. 54950 ET SEQ.,

Hope v. California Youth Authority (2005), 134 Cal.App.4th 577
CYA HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR SUPERVISORY INACTION RE DISCRIMINATION BASED ON SEXUAL ORIENTATION.

Michael Claudio v. Regents Of The University of California, (2005) 134 Cal.App.4 th 224
EMPLOYER REQUIRED TO ENGAGE IN AN INTERACTIVE PROCESS PROCESS TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE A DISABLED EMPLOYEE.

Vol. Twenty No. Ten - October 2005

In re WORK UNIFORM CASES. SALVADOR GOSHORN et al., v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., [And six other cases.] * 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1588
WHO BEARS THE FINANCIAL BURDEN FOR MANDATED UNIFORMS?

Vol. Twenty No. Nine - September 2005

WILLIAM B. KOLENDER, as Sheriff, etc., v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, (TIMOTHY BERRY, Real Party in Interest) 132 C.A. 4 th 716 (2005)
ABUSE OF DISCRETION FOUND WHERE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION REDUCES DEPUTY'S TERMINATION FOR LYING TO A SUSPENSION.

Vol. Twenty No. Seven - July 2005

MENDOZA V. TOWN OF ROSS, et al., 128 Cal.App. 4th 625
UNCOMPENSATED VOLUNTEER IS NOT "EMPLOYEE."

BALDWIN V. PLACER COUNTY, et al., 405 F.3rd 778 (9th Cir.2005)
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY DENIED OFFICER WHO FILED A MISLEADING AFFIDAVIT TO OBTAIN A SEARCH WARRANT.

GILBERT V. CITY OF SUNNYVALE, et al, 130 Cal.App. 4th 1264
WHERE LA REPORT CONTAINS VERBATIM EXTRACTS OF WITNESS STATEMENTS DUE PROCESS SATISFIED FOR PRE-TERMINATION PROCESS.

BERCERRADA V. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CO. (LASO), 131 Cal.App. 4th 409
OFFICER HAS RIGHT TO RECEIVE INFORMATION RELEASED BY DEPARTMENT PURSUANT TO SUCCESSFUL PITCHESS MOTION.

Vol. Twenty No. Six - June 2005

FLORIO V. CITY OF ONTARIO, 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1091
MOU COST SHARING BY EMPLOYEE FOR HEARING OFFICER UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Vol. Twenty No. Five - May 2005

TILLISON V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO, 406 F. 3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2005)
"PATROL TOWING" UNDER VEHICLE CODE §22658 NOT PREEMPTED BY FEDERAL LAW.

BLANDFORD V. CO. OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 406 F. 3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2005)
REASONABLE FORCE UPHELD IN SHOOTING.

CUTTER V. WILKINSON, 125 S. Ct. 2113 (2005).

Vol. Twenty No. Four - April 2005

CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING V. SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO COUNTY, 128 Cal. Rptr. 4th 281 (2005)
INFORMATION FORWARDED BY EMPLOYING AGENCIES RECEIVED AND MAINTAINED BY POST PERTAINING TO PEACE OFFICERS NOT SUBJECT TO DISCOVERY UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE §6550 ET SEQ.

MENDOZA V. TOWN OF ROSS, et al., 125 Cal. App. 4 th 921 (2004)
UNCOMPENSATED VOLUNTEER NOT AN EMPLOYEE FOR PURPOSES OF LIABILITY FOR UNLAWFUL EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES UNDER FEHA.

Vol. Twenty No. One - January 2005

HINRICHS V. COUNTY OF ORANGE, et al., 125 Cal. App. 4 th 921 (2004)
GOVERNMENT CODE § 3304(g) ENTITLES SUBJECT OFFICER TO DISCOVERY OF REPORTS, NOTES, ETC., AFTER AN IA INVESTIGATION.

Top of Page